![]() Multiple virtual processors are helpful for when you have a computationally intensive application, and you need to split the work. While there are times that you may need them, most people will not. There's a big push right now for multiple virtual processors, and 64-bit Windows. That said, anecdotally, we find XP under virtualization to be snappier … and definitely less annoying to run. You should make your choice based on which OS you want or for compatibility reasons. In fact, while XP continues to be faster for most things, it's probably not enough to matter. Now, the difference is much less significant. In our last virtualization benchmarking article, there was a significant difference between running Microsoft XP vs. Specifically, we looked at the differences between XP and Windows 7, as well as multiple virtual processors and 64-bit Windows 7. There are additional conclusions that we can extract from the results as well. ![]() And we highly recommend the games we looked at and tested here. Furthermore, you may want to use a virtualization setup that allows you to share a Boot Camp volume with your virtual machine so that you can have even greater performance when you want it.Įither way, we were pleasantly surprised at just how well these games played in Parallels Desktop 5. If gaming is your primary reason for a virtual machine, then figure out what games you want to play, double check the online discussions about them, and go for it. Our advice? There's no doubt, Parallels Desktop 5 is a huge leap forward not only from Parallels Desktop 4, but also all versions of VMware Fusion. Parallels ran game fine.įigure 21: Gaming Performance Gaming Conclusions XP: Parallels Desktop 28.1% faster (4.1 frames out of 18.92 average FPS).Windows 7: Parallels Desktop 45.2% faster (13.7 frames out of 44.12 average FPS).XP: Parallels Desktop 52.6% faster (18.2 frames out of 52.73 average FPS).Civilization IV: Colonization, FPS in demo mode.Windows 7: Parallels Desktop 498.3% faster (94.4 frames out of 113.39 average FPS).XP: Parallels Desktop 130.4% faster (28.5 frames out of 50.26 average FPS). Parallels and windows 7 for mac pro#As expected, both environments took advantage of the extra graphics hardware of the MacBook Pro and Mac Pro, but Parallels took greater advantage of it. In short, the speed difference in FPS was noticeably faster in Parallels Desktop when compared to VMware Fusion. Parallels and windows 7 for mac for mac#VMware Fusion How do VMware Fusion 3 and Parallels Desktop 5 for Mac compare?īy Neil Ticktin, Editor-in-Chief/PublisherĪfter installing the game through Steam ( ), we tested the game by measuring frames per second while running a consistent demo mode. VMware FusionĬolumn Tag: Virtualization Head-to-Head: Parallels Desktop for Mac vs. Head-to-Head: Parallels Desktop for Mac vs. Educational Institution and Student Discounts.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |